TOPIC-Research shows that advertising is as harmful to People's health as smoking. Therefore the advertisements for certain food products should be banned, as the ads of cigarette are banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this modern era, obesity is one of the major puzzles in our society nowadays. Therefore, some people opine that fast-food ads should be banned just like cigarettes. While this approach can be proved beneficial up to some extent, this far from being the best method.
On the one hand, there is numerous reason why we should not ban food advertising, the first and foremost is that without advertising, people would not be able to make informed choices, in addiction freedom of choice is one of the key principles of a democratic society. For example, we live in a democratic society, where every people have freedom of choice although, when people see ads on TV or social media they have there own choice if they think it could be beneficial for then they consumed it otherwise they can supersede it. Therefore, I believe live in a democratic country we have our own choice. Consequently, the food advertising ban is not a proper way to solve the obesity problem in our society.
On the other hand, some people think banned food advertising should help to solve the overweight problem. Admittedly, I agree with the given statement, for instance, studies have shown a clear link between the regular consumption of fast food and obesity also fast food is unhealthy and advertising it is irresponsible. However, there is no need for fast food advertisement because it is already everywhere, thus I believe we should encourage people to eat healthy food as well as aware them the side effect of fast-food.
In conclusion, while the banned advertisement is not the proper way to solve the obesity problem, it will need a proper plan with some other effort to solved the problem.
Please sir evaluate my essay.
In this modern era, obesity is one of the major puzzles in our society nowadays. Therefore, some people opine that fast-food ads should be banned just like cigarettes. While this approach can be proved beneficial up to some extent, this far from being the best method.
On the one hand, there is numerous reason why we should not ban food advertising, the first and foremost is that without advertising, people would not be able to make informed choices, in addiction freedom of choice is one of the key principles of a democratic society. For example, we live in a democratic society, where every people have freedom of choice although, when people see ads on TV or social media they have there own choice if they think it could be beneficial for then they consumed it otherwise they can supersede it. Therefore, I believe live in a democratic country we have our own choice. Consequently, the food advertising ban is not a proper way to solve the obesity problem in our society.
On the other hand, some people think banned food advertising should help to solve the overweight problem. Admittedly, I agree with the given statement, for instance, studies have shown a clear link between the regular consumption of fast food and obesity also fast food is unhealthy and advertising it is irresponsible. However, there is no need for fast food advertisement because it is already everywhere, thus I believe we should encourage people to eat healthy food as well as aware them the side effect of fast-food.
In conclusion, while the banned advertisement is not the proper way to solve the obesity problem, it will need a proper plan with some other effort to solved the problem.
Please sir evaluate my essay.
